▼
Advanced Options
?
Sort by:
popularity
similarity
?
Must Include:
?
Cannot Include:
?
Look For
▼
Sponsored Links
You're looking for other sites like :
|
|
No information avaiable
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/
popularity:
semanticweb
rdf
w3c
semantic
web
semweb
web2.0
semantic_web
semantic-web
discussion
|
new
search by a custom tag signature
|
|
Cambridge Semantics is a provider of semantic middleware and application ... We provide a single, universal layer for representing, accessing and combining ...
similarity:
popularity:
semanticweb
company
semantic
rdf
spreadsheet
tools
web
open
excel
opensource
|
 |
Where earlier languages have been used to develop tools and ontologies for ... Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, (W3C) Semantic Web Activity Lead ...
similarity:
popularity:
owl
ontology
semanticweb
w3c
rdf
web
xml
reference
semantic
standards
|
|
|
... network, nova spivack, novaspivack, recommendation engine, search, semantic, ... and the discussions simply work better than they do in my Typepad blog. ...
similarity:
popularity:
blog
semanticweb
web3.0
technology
semantic
web
blogs
ontology
web2.0
twine
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
web
semanticweb
web_semantico
web2.0
semantico
rdf
web3.0
semantic
web-semantico
xml
|
|
|
Company that providing consulting and tools for architectural design and implementation of Semantic Technology ... TopQuadrant Announces First Semantic ...
similarity:
popularity:
semanticweb
ontology
semantic
rdf
company
tools
owl
consulting
software
web2.0
|
|
|
Stuff in, triples out. http://triplr.org/output/source-uri ... wired.com/cultofmac # Turtle from HTML via GRDDL http://triplr.org/turtle/www. ...
similarity:
popularity:
rdf
semanticweb
json
rss
tools
grddl
api
semweb
converter
web
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
semanticweb
semantic
introduction
semantic-web
web
ontology
part1
overview
tutorial
semantic_web
|
|
|
OWL ontologies are most commonly serialized using RDF/XML syntax. ... Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Ontology_Language" ...
similarity:
popularity:
owl
ontology
semanticweb
rdf
semantic
web
wikipedia
language
web2.0
web3.0
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
rdf
semanticweb
reviews
sparql
web2.0
tagging
foaf
semantic
review
community
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
semanticweb
linkeddata
rdf
web3.0
data
semantic
datasets
database
web
linked-data
|
Sorting Results
- This slider determines how the matched sites are sorted.
- If you want to see the most popular sites that are somewhat related to your search, slide this more towards "popularity."
- If you want to see the sites that best matched your search, regardless of popularity, slide this towards "similarity."
Must Include Tags
- Matched sites will not be shown unless they have all of the tags on this list.
- This feature is useful for when you require a site to have been tagged as something.
- To add a tag to this list, click "add tag" or click on any tag in a result.
Must Not Include Tags
- Matched sites that have any tag on this list will not be shown.
- This feature is useful for filtering out results that have tags you are absolutely not interested in.
- To add a tag to this list, click "add tag" or click on any tag in a result.
Types of Results
- This option lets you specify the types of sites to show.
- If you want to only see domains (www.
.com), select "domains only." - If you want to only see articles (www.
.com/something/here), select "articles only." - If you don't care, or care so much about both, select "Both".
About The Results
an example search result
How moreofit Searches
Each website has a unique tag signature -- a set of words
that users have described the website as. Moreofit searches
for websites that have similar tag signatures and displays the results.
1: Similarity
A site's "similarity" is determined by how well its tag signature matches the tag
signature that is being searched for. A 100% match means that it has the exact same
tags in the exact same order, while a 0% match means it has no tags in common.
2: Popularity
The popularity of a website is, well, pretty much self explanatory.
3: Tag Signature
The tag signatures show how a site is described. The deeper the color of the tag,
the more frequently the website is tagged as this. Tags underlined blue denote a tag
that is in common with the search's tag signature.
