▼
Advanced Options
?
Sort by:
popularity
similarity
?
Must Include:
?
Cannot Include:
?
Look For
▼
Sponsored Links
You're looking for other sites like :
|
|
No information avaiable
http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/tutorials/protegeowltutorial/
popularity:
tutorial
owl
protege
semanticweb
ontology
tutorials
tools
ontologies
semantic-web
rdf
|
new
search by a custom tag signature
|
|
CO-ODE. Collaborative Open Ontology Development Environment project from the Medical Informatics Group at the University of Manchester
similarity:
popularity:
owl
tutorial
ontology
protege
semanticweb
rdf
ontologies
research
semantic
tutorials
|
|
|
CO-ODE. Collaborative Open Ontology Development Environment project from the Medical Informatics Group at the University of Manchester
similarity:
popularity:
ontology
owl
protege
semanticweb
tutorial
software
semantic
ontologies
rdf
tools
|
|
|
We're still using Protege, but this time working with the new ALPHA version and getting deeper into concepts. Get the...
similarity:
popularity:
semanticweb
protege
ontology
owl
screencast
semantic
tutorial
video
rdf
howto
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
ontology
semanticweb
protege
owl
rdf
semantic
screencast
editor
howto
tutorial
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
owl
protege
api
java
ontology
programming
tutorial
semanticweb
rdf
jena
|
|
|
Given such an ontology, the OWL formal semantics specifies how to derive its ... consequences, i.e. facts not literally present in the ontology, but entailed by ...
similarity:
popularity:
owl
semanticweb
ontology
rdf
opensource
software
java
semantic
tools
protege
|
|
|
No information avaiable
similarity:
popularity:
ontology
semanticweb
tutorial
semantic
ontologies
owl
semantic_web
ai
web
tutorials
|
|
|
Protégé-2000 (http://protege.stanford.edu) was developed by Mark Musen's group ... http://protege.stanford.edu. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. ...
similarity:
popularity:
ontology
semanticweb
tutorial
ontologies
owl
design
taxonomy
semantic
web
metadata
|
|
|
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/ Latest version: ... course, the URIs of the defined ontologies will not usually be w3.org references. ...
similarity:
popularity:
owl
ontology
semanticweb
w3c
rdf
web
semantic
ontologies
guide
reference
|
|
|
This page contains information about all activities related to OWL at the School of Computer Science at the University of Manchester.
similarity:
popularity:
owl
semanticweb
ontology
manchester
reference
protege
dl
tutorial
repository
|
Sorting Results
- This slider determines how the matched sites are sorted.
- If you want to see the most popular sites that are somewhat related to your search, slide this more towards "popularity."
- If you want to see the sites that best matched your search, regardless of popularity, slide this towards "similarity."
Must Include Tags
- Matched sites will not be shown unless they have all of the tags on this list.
- This feature is useful for when you require a site to have been tagged as something.
- To add a tag to this list, click "add tag" or click on any tag in a result.
Must Not Include Tags
- Matched sites that have any tag on this list will not be shown.
- This feature is useful for filtering out results that have tags you are absolutely not interested in.
- To add a tag to this list, click "add tag" or click on any tag in a result.
Types of Results
- This option lets you specify the types of sites to show.
- If you want to only see domains (www.
.com), select "domains only." - If you want to only see articles (www.
.com/something/here), select "articles only." - If you don't care, or care so much about both, select "Both".
About The Results
an example search result
How moreofit Searches
Each website has a unique tag signature -- a set of words
that users have described the website as. Moreofit searches
for websites that have similar tag signatures and displays the results.
1: Similarity
A site's "similarity" is determined by how well its tag signature matches the tag
signature that is being searched for. A 100% match means that it has the exact same
tags in the exact same order, while a 0% match means it has no tags in common.
2: Popularity
The popularity of a website is, well, pretty much self explanatory.
3: Tag Signature
The tag signatures show how a site is described. The deeper the color of the tag,
the more frequently the website is tagged as this. Tags underlined blue denote a tag
that is in common with the search's tag signature.
